Subject	Zimulator tuning vs. AFCII tuning
Posted by	sandarian on January 28, 2006 at 11:26 PM
	This message has been viewed 184 times.
Message	Most TT's I see have only been tuned with the AFCII only. however I wondering if someone has had their car tuned both ways and has had any gains by using the zimulator instead of just using an AFCII. Also I was thinking that since you can change your timing rpm specific with the zimulator instead of using a timing light you could raise timing in the earlier rpms to make boost faster that way which would really benefit cars with big turbos since it would help overcome lag and the car should make better overall power. Thx. JB.
Follow Ups	Zimulator tuning vs. AFCII tuning - sandarian 23:26:25 01/28/06 AFCII is a piggy back unit that tricks the computer. Better - Knapper411 23:29:17 01/28/06 Zemulator - Rob'Z 23:37:48 01/28/06 Excuse the dumb question but does the Zemulator work on a - 300zxquire 02:07:27 01/29/06 I believe it plugs into the socket - mattztt 02:47:00 01/29/06 Thanks. (n/m) - 300zxquire 03:56:18 01/29/06 It just goes in place of the chip or connects to it.... - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 04:09:04 01/29/06 Thanks (n/m) - 300zxquire 10:40:11 01/29/06 I use an AFC-1 to control my second MAF sensor - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 04:12:21 01/29/06 FWIW, I have drawn up a circuit for a dual-mas controller - Ash's Z 11:28:22 01/29/06 Awesome Ash, I am looking forward to those - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 11:40:05 01/29/06 Implementing N2O control, water injection control, or any - Ash's Z 14:37:48 01/29/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.